[ad_1]
Final week’s recreation at Wisconsin ended up being a rout in favor of the Wolverines. Will the maize and blue be capable to make it two on the street?
This one is a bit more daunting, as Nebraska, regardless of the 3-3 document, has proven a pulse all season-long, extra moving into its personal manner than something. The Wolverines have proven few weaknesses up to now, with nonetheless simply the one half towards Rutgers being the lone two quarters by which Michigan hasn’t been completely dominant.
Conversely, Nebraska has a stellar offense, save for its porous offensive line. Adrian Martinez has been in beast mode all season and the Michigan protection has but to face a top-rated offense this yr.
That is how the 2 rank towards one another in keeping with the numbers.
Associated
What they mentioned: Scott Frost says Michigans protection causes havoc
Jim Harbaugh calls Nebraska spectacular, ‘Gonna be a giant problem’
Kirk Herbstreit: Michigan ‘looks like they’ve acquired some angst towards the world’
Offense
|
Rank (metric) |
Rank (metric) |
||
|
Michigan scoring offense |
twelfth (39.8 ppg) |
thirteenth (15.5 ppg) |
Nebraska scoring protection |
|
Michigan dashing offense |
seventh (255 ypg) |
forty third (122.17 ypga) |
Nebraska dashing protection |
|
Michigan passing offense |
112th (181.6 ypg) |
forty third (199.8 ypga) |
Nebraska passing protection |
|
Michigan whole offense |
fortieth (436.8 ypg) |
forty second (322 ypga) |
Nebraska whole protection |
|
Michigan yards per play |
twenty second (6.74 ypp) |
thirty sixth (4.88 ypga) |
Nebraska yards per play allowed |
|
Michigan first downs |
eightieth (20 pg) |
twenty third (16.5 apg) |
Nebraska opp. first downs |
|
Michigan third down conv. |
forty seventh (43.75%) |
69th (37.35%) |
Nebraska opp. third down conv. |
|
Michigan fourth down conv. |
thirty second (66.67%) |
fifth (20%) |
Nebraska opp. fourth down conv. |
|
Michigan pink zone conv. |
thirteenth (95%) |
sixth (67.4%) |
Nebraska opp. pink zone conv. |
|
Michigan sacks allowed |
2nd (0.2 sapg) |
sixtieth (1.83 spg) |
Nebraska sacks |
|
Michigan TFL allowed |
1st (2.2 tfla/gm) |
ninth (6.67 tfl/gm) |
Nebraska TFL |
|
Michigan lengthy scrimmage performs |
97th (59 10+ yd performs) |
69th (65 10+ yd performs) |
Nebraska lengthy performs allowed |
|
Michigan penalties |
thirtieth (44.3 yds/gm) |
77th (51.7 yds/gm) |
Nebraska opp. penalties |
|
Michigan TOP |
fortieth (31:01.4) |
thirty third (31:41.5) |
Nebraska TOP |
Record
Predicting each Huge Ten school soccer recreation in Week 6
Protection
|
Rank (metric) |
Rank (metric) |
||
|
Michigan scoring protection |
sixth (12.8 ppg) |
fiftieth (34.3 ppg) |
Nebraska scoring offense |
|
Michigan dashing protection |
thirty third (115 ypga) |
14th (235.5 ypg) |
Nebraska dashing offense |
|
Michigan passing protection |
sixteenth (170.6 ypga) |
fortieth (266.5 ypg) |
Nebraska passing offense |
|
Michigan whole protection |
14th (285.8 ypga) |
eleventh (502 ypg) |
Nebraska whole offense |
|
Michigan yards per play allowed |
seventeenth (4.48 yppa) |
twenty fourth (6.69 ypp) |
Nebraska yards per play |
|
Michigan opp. first downs |
sixteenth (16 apg) |
twenty first (24 pg) |
Nebraska first downs |
|
Michigan opp. third down conv. |
thirty eighth (35.06%) |
twenty seventh (47.25%) |
Nebraska third down conv. |
|
Michigan opp. fourth down conv. |
thirty ninth (40%) |
thirty ninth (69.23%) |
Nebraska fourth down conv. |
|
Michigan opp. pink zone conv. |
98th (88.89%) |
87th (80%) |
Nebraska pink zone conv. |
|
Michigan sacks |
thirty fifth (2.6 s/gm) |
121st (3 sa/gm) |
Nebraska sacks allowed |
|
Michigan TFL |
77th (5.4 tfl/gm) |
a hundred and fifteenth (6.33 tfla/gm) |
Nebraska TFL allowed |
|
Michigan lengthy scrimmage performs allowed |
twelfth (47 10+ yd performs) |
nineteenth (84 10+ yd performs) |
Nebraska lengthy performs |
|
Michigan opp. penalties |
118th (38.6 yd/gm) |
thirty eighth (46.2 yd/gm) |
Nebraska penalties |
|
Michigan turnover margin |
twelfth (+1/gm) |
61st (0/gm) |
Nebraska turnover margin |
Record
ESPN FPI: Michigan soccer game-by-game predictions after Week 4
Particular groups
|
Rank (metric) |
Rank (metric) |
||
|
Michigan kickoff |
66th (62.79 yds) |
a hundred and thirtieth (65.35 yds) |
Nebraska opp. kickoff |
|
Michigan kickoff return |
sixtieth (21.45 yds/ret) |
93rd (22.63 yds/ret) |
Nebraska kickoff return allowed |
|
Michigan punting |
sixtieth (43.6 yds/p) |
a hundred and fifteenth (45.47 yds/p) |
Nebraska opp. punting |
|
Michigan punt return |
fifteenth (15.92 yds/ret) |
128th (23 yds/ret) |
Nebraska punt return allowed |
|
Michigan discipline objectives |
twenty ninth (88.9%) |
seventh (36.4%) |
Nebraska opp. discipline objectives |
|
Michigan PAT |
1st (100%) |
52nd (100%) |
Nebraska opp. PAT |
|
Michigan opp. kickoff |
2nd (55.71 yds) |
forty sixth (63.47 yds) |
Nebraska kickoff |
|
Michigan kickoff return allowed |
1st (7.75 yds/ret) |
119th (15 yds/ret) |
Nebraska kickoff return |
|
Michigan opp. punting |
107th (44.93 yds/p) |
122nd (38.32 yds/p) |
Nebraska punting |
|
Michigan punt return allowed |
thirty third (4 yds/ret) |
one hundred and twenty fifth (1.14 yds/ret) |
Nebraska punt return |
|
Michigan opp. discipline objectives |
forty ninth (71.4%) |
114th (50%) |
Nebraska discipline objectives |
|
Michigan opp. PAT |
52nd (100%) |
123rd (88.5%) |
Nebraska PAT |
Stream school soccer video games from the SEC, Huge 12, The American, and extra on ESPN+
[ad_2]
supply